These are the questions to Robby that demand an answer!You said “the QED is just a cheap copy of ML's IP” Prove it!
Could you prove this allegation beyond all reasonable doubt in another place and another time?
You implied that when I published the pictures of the unprotected GP extreme circuit board that I must have done so knowing full well that the detector was "unlawfully removed".
Could you prove this in a court of law beyond all reasonable doubt? Would you like to find out?
Can you tell us what section of circuits layout act 1989 is legally relevant to the pictures of a unprotected gp extreme “printed circuit board”?
You said: "Note that one mob's original application failed and their granted innovation patent doesn't protect what they think it does!!”
Robby_H would you care to elaborate on this ?
You said:"It's also worth noting that you can't apply the patent to IP owned by someone else and then sell the product as a new item without first purchasing a license from the other party"!
Robby_H what are you implying here?
Are you for example suggesting that the QED uses IP owned by "someone else" and therefore cannot be sold as a new item without purchasing a license from the "other party"?
If the answer to the above is yes then whose IP (that is owned by "another party") do you allege or better still can prove that the QED is using?
Can you provide any evidence from any patent claims to show that the QED is using IP owned by "another party"?
If the QED is using IP owned by "someone else" then why was the innovation patent granted?
Here is Robby's' latest unsubstantiated,wild allegation re the QED:"you have copied Minelab's long TC coil circuits etc"
Where is your evidence Robby?Do you have the schematics of the QED?
Do you have the MC code?Robby when are going to stop hiding under the skirts of your minders on finders and be
man and come here and answer my questions?What are you
afraid of or what do you have to hide?
Maybe your puppet masters don't want you to be exposed?
Robby, what a dill you really are!You talk on finders about a claim 5 which is NOT in the granted QED patent!Why are you again trying to deceive and mislead your readers?Poor old Robby you just can't accept the fact that the QED innovation patent has been granted and what a total idiot you now appear for saying:”the QED patent has failed”!
doug
Author
