Just how stupid is Robby_H?Without prejudice
In the public interest
Not content with defaming me (
“----- knowing full well it was stolen---”) as regards the pictures of the unprotected Gp extreme circuit board an allegation which
I totally refute he now, I allege defames BW over the QED with statements like:
“its a cheap and nasty copy of ML's Ip” and other allegations. Now if these allegations were tested in law then the
onus is on Robby to prove them true beyond all reasonable doubt! As regard the QED this means that he must prove beyond all reasonable doubt that the
latest rev of the QED is
“ is a cheap and nasty copy of ML's Ip”etc He does not have
any information whatsoever on the latest QED as regards its circuit layout, schematics or firmware so how could he prove his allegations? My GS5b works well with low resistance/low inductance coils so I suppose according to the patent parrot, Eric must be using ML's long Tc coil circuits!!!

What a dill you are Robby!
Robby -H may be able to avoid answering the tough questions on a forum but he could not ignore a subpoena or answering questions under oath if sued for defamation!! In such matters he would be asked by an aggressive barrister to detail the source of his information or allegations which I allege would open up a can of worms and I allege could implicate other parties in the the obtaining of information
without the knowledge or consent of BW ie theft of IP or industrial espionage!Now I hope this answers the question from the flounders moron from daisy hill!
doug
