northwest Court Sentencing Question?
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 21, 2012, 07:37:18 AM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Robby_H :Why can't you provide any evidence for your assertions? Why was the whole "Dr Candy's GB method" thread deleted from finders forum after this post was cross posted there? Who is running scared? Who really controls finders?
http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/qed-micro-controlled-pi-detector-by-bugwhiskers/robby_h-why-can%27t-you-provide-any-evidence-for-your-assertions
NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding. http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/climate-change/nasa-climate-%27skeptics%27-respond-with-science!-just-kidding/msg20769/#msg20769
The consequences of a 100ppm rise in C02 levels.  http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/climate-change/the-consequences-of-a-100ppm-rise-in-c02-levels/
12 years is not a reasonable time:updated http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/climate-change/12-years-is-not-a-reasonable-time!/msg20848/?topicseen#msg20848

australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Common interest forum.  |  Basic Questions Forum  |  Topic: Court Sentencing Question? 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Court Sentencing Question?  (Read 303 times)
Alluvium
invited members
Junior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 343
« on: February 14, 2011, 08:02:24 PM »
Hi Doug,

Can you advise me, what is the current sentence for the crime of treachery in Australia?
While you are looking that up, can you please see what the going rate for Industrial Espionage is too?

Thank you for your time in this endeavour. 

Concerned member.

Alluvium.   
Logged
Huego
invited members
Supreme Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2880


For Truth - Queda Esto Demostrado
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2011, 10:49:30 PM »
Quote from: Alluvium on February 14, 2011, 08:02:24 PM
Hi Doug,

Can you advise me, what is the current sentence for the crime of treachery in Australia?
While you are looking that up, can you please see what the going rate for Industrial Espionage is too?

Thank you for your time in this endeavour. 

Concerned member.

Alluvium.   



Alluvium,

may I endeavour to help Doug out with this using a popular source readers can check.

For a violation of trust, see “betrayal”.

“Treachery” is a statutory offence in Australia. (There was also an unrelated statutory offence bearing that name in the United Kingdom, but it has been abolished.) Both of these offences were derived from or inspired by the related offence of treason. The name treachery was chosen because it is a synonym for treason.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treachery

CRIMES ACT 1914 - SECT 24AA

"Treachery"

 http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca191482/s24aa.html

A person who contravenes a provision of this section shall be guilty of an indictable offence, called treachery.   
Penalty:  Imprisonment for life.

Huego
Logged
Views expressed by Huego are without prejudice, in the public interest & for their goddam "right to know".

Huego reserves his right to: think freely & speculate, express & defend himself, with truth as he sees it, use wit & humour, make mistakes & even to change his mind!
Huego
invited members
Supreme Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2880


For Truth - Queda Esto Demostrado
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2011, 11:11:24 PM »
Hi Alluvium, I am NOT Doug but here is some stuff you & others might find interesting.

Industrial Espionage

A good read, especially this part ...... "5. Agents and the process of collection"

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_espionage

Industrial espionage laws - Is protecting trade secrets & business intelligence good for the economy?

         http://www.aic.gov.au/media/1999/march/990330.aspx   (last revised / modified 2009)

Industrial espionage: criminal or civil remedies

Dempsey discusses whether existing Australian legal safeguards against industrial espionages are adequate, or whether the greater use of criminal sanctions, such as those introduced in the United States of America, might be more appropriate.

         http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/tandi/101-120/tandi106.aspx

Cheers,  Huego
Logged
Views expressed by Huego are without prejudice, in the public interest & for their goddam "right to know".

Huego reserves his right to: think freely & speculate, express & defend himself, with truth as he sees it, use wit & humour, make mistakes & even to change his mind!
Alluvium
invited members
Junior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 343
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2011, 11:18:13 PM »
Hi Huego,

Thank you your Honour, I hope I haven't put you to too much trouble.  ::53::

I will withdraw the Questions.  ::38::

Cheers Alluvium.
Logged
Huego
invited members
Supreme Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2880


For Truth - Queda Esto Demostrado
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2011, 11:38:07 PM »
No trouble when these are interesting questions in todays detector world Alluvium.
Its a wild and unpredictable place where you Can't see the Wood for the Trees sometimes!

Would you have preferred His Greater Honour (His Highest Lordship Doug) to have answered your legal questions? Ie were they specifically directed at him or for anyone who knew (or could find out) to answer?
An answer is an answer (a truth is a truth) no matter who the messenger is, or who delivers it on forums to me.

Pleased to be of some assistance in your (our) quest for justice and answers.

Huego (junior judge in sitting)

Logged
Views expressed by Huego are without prejudice, in the public interest & for their goddam "right to know".

Huego reserves his right to: think freely & speculate, express & defend himself, with truth as he sees it, use wit & humour, make mistakes & even to change his mind!
Aziz
invited members
Senior Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1469
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2011, 11:43:09 PM »
There is no bigger judge than the truth.
 ::38::
Logged
"Without prejudice"
My forum contribution is my own personal view & opinion.
Feel free to sue me. Not the forum owner and admin.
Huego
invited members
Supreme Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2880


For Truth - Queda Esto Demostrado
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2011, 11:52:34 PM »
Quote from: Aziz on February 14, 2011, 11:43:09 PM
There is no bigger judge than the truth.
 ::38::

I AGREE 100% Aziz!  ::38::
Logged
Views expressed by Huego are without prejudice, in the public interest & for their goddam "right to know".

Huego reserves his right to: think freely & speculate, express & defend himself, with truth as he sees it, use wit & humour, make mistakes & even to change his mind!
dustyminer
Guest
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2011, 11:59:02 PM »
Quote from: Huego on February 14, 2011, 11:52:34 PM
Quote from: Aziz on February 14, 2011, 11:43:09 PM
There is no bigger judge than the truth.
 ::38::

I AGREE 100% Aziz!  ::38::

obviously you blokes haven't met my last girlfriend 
Logged
Huego
invited members
Supreme Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2880


For Truth - Queda Esto Demostrado
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2011, 12:04:52 AM »
But I heard about her Dusty!

He middle name was not Verity nor Violet. It was more like Violation (for violation of your trust!)  ::55::  ::54::
Logged
Views expressed by Huego are without prejudice, in the public interest & for their goddam "right to know".

Huego reserves his right to: think freely & speculate, express & defend himself, with truth as he sees it, use wit & humour, make mistakes & even to change his mind!
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Common interest forum.  |  Basic Questions Forum  |  Topic: Court Sentencing Question? « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN 		Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!