northwest A small problem of credibility!
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Sunday November 29 2015 08:57:27 EST AM
Home Help Login Register
News: forum firewall bad behaviour Cloudflare Bot scout
Welcome to the Australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum founded in July 2010, an add free totally independent forum with over 70 boards and paid for and managed by the Admin.Total forum Topics: 8,119 Total forum Posts: 36,986 Members: 537
Admin and  forum owner :marjen at
Only registered members can post.Registration must be approved by admin.Guests cannot view all boards or see any links in posts.
The above plugins are FREE and help protect the forum from hackers and spambots.
see just a small sample of endorsements for the forum below: 6.4 million visitors can't be wrong!
 From 1Halfgram4three :"Now if you want a forum that's informitive and expertly run, this site below is the one for you"
“I trust you 100% Doug, it's just a topic/matter that's being brought up on other forums lately, once again your gone above and beyond to ensure this forum remains one of the very best and user secure gold prospecting forums that I know of. "I guess people know where all the real action is, enjoy all your topics/info and the way you keep your forum free of well, we know what lol, well done!!"
“You are a top bloke doug   By giving this bloke the best advice out of everyone, to save him a small fortune and legal trouble for years “
“-------this site  (dougs)has all the real action,projects, truths, non-deleting of topics and above all the best personalities"
PM to me from a new member.
“Terrific forum glad I joined! The work you have put in is obvious and I am sure is appreciated by members”
Hi Doug,
“I  do not agree with everything you post here as I have told you privately but I do congratulate you on how you manage the forum. Its free of all the nasty personal stuff we  often see on finders and the offensive ,vile and nasty stuff that dominates 1/2 grams forum. I was very surprised to find that 1/2 gram was once member here but can understand now why you banned him.”Thanks again keep up the good work”
Updates on the Moodz pulsar detector,
The  sad 7000 saga: latest update Sept 9th! More sad news! More experienced prospectors sell their Zeds .   
Note how all the sycophantic pro ML anti anything else sucks like Robby_H  (the ostrich syndrome :put your head in  the sand!)remain silent about all the problems that have been reported for the 7000!Shameful and pathetic and gutless indeed!He is not up to a challenge either, he wimps out or makes pathetic excuses or raises red herrings to hide his ineptitude!
Who is wrong JP or thePatent Parrot =Robby_H?
JP:“In simple terms the GPZ is a full blown, full power VLF”
'Patent parrot”=Robby_H on flounders follies
“Dud is telling his two or three faithful that the GPZ is a VLF detector.”
Now who is wrong JP or the Patent parrot? I think Patent parrot”=Robby_H is wrong YET again! LOL!

australian electronic gold prospecting  |  Off topic  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: A small problem of credibility! 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: A small problem of credibility!  (Read 252 times)
Revered Supreme Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 13858

« on: Friday March 16 2012 23:31:09 EST PM »

A small problem of credibility!
31,000 American scientists have signed onto the Global Warming Petition Project
“The 30,000 scientists and science graduates listed on the OISM petition represent a tiny fraction (0.3%) of all science graduates. More importantly, the OISM list only contains 39 scientists who specialist in climate science.”
The vast majority of those who have signed the Oregon Petition have no background in climate science .
An even smaller proportion are actually practicing climate scientists.
Anyone with a Bsc can sign. Imagine the hundreds of thousands that graduate with these every year. Consider the millions who already have them. This petition has been open for any one of these to sign. All they have to do is read the petition online and mail in their signature. It’s no secret. In fact, it’s been repeatedly widely publicized.

The National Academy of Sciences released the following statement regarding the OISM Petition:
"The petition project was a deliberate attempt to mislead scientists and to rally them in an attempt to undermine support for the Kyoto Protocol. The petition was not based on a review of the science of global climate change, nor were its signers experts in the field of climate science."

Ie the petition is not worth the paper its written on!

Global Warming Denial Machine

Ufox you have got to do better! You are just another-global-warming-denier who slavishly follows the global warming denial machine rather than getting off your bum and reading and researching the issues from climate scientists in the best peer reviewed journals!
Climate myths: The cooling after 1940 shows CO2 does not cause warming
Mann's hockey stick confirmed by multiple proxys!
doug smile
Further update on sea level rises
A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise
John A. Church
CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Neil J. White
CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Global sea level linked to global temperature
Martin Vermeera,1 and Stefan Rahmstorfb
Department of Surveying, Helsinki University of Technology, P.O. Box 1200, FI-02150, Espoo, Finland; and bPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,
Telegrafenberg A62, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Edited by William C. Clark, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved October 26, 2009 (received for review July 15, 2009)
We propose a simple relationship linking global sea-level variations on time scales of decades to centuries to global mean temperature. This relationship is tested on synthetic data from a global climate model for the past millennium and the next century. When applied to observed data of sea level and temperature for 1880–2000, and taking into account known anthropogenic hydrologic contributions to sea level, the correlation is >0.99, explaining 98% of the variance. For future global temperature scenarios of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fourth Assessment Report, the relationship projects a sea-level rise ranging from 75 to 190 cm for the period 1990–2010

Projections of future sea level becoming more dire
Jonathan T. Overpecka,b,c,1 and Jeremy L. Weissb
Institute of the Environment, University of Arizona, 845 North Park Avenue, Suite 532, Tucson, AZ 85719; bDepartment of
Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 East 4th Street, Tucson, AZ 85721; and cDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences,
University of Arizona, 1118 East 4th Street, Tucson, AZ 85721
PNAS  December 22, 2009  vol. 106  no. 51  21461–21462
When i get time i will upload some data to show the mean global sea level rises over the period they have been measured.As usual the peer reviewed climate science is against you!!!

Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre
Position analysis:climate change,sea-level rise and extreme events:impacts and adaptation issues

Sea-Level Rise from the Late 19th to the Early 21st Century

John A. Church • Neil J. White
Received: 2 November 2010 / Accepted: 7 March 2011 / Published online: 30 March 2011
 The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at
Surv Geophys (2011) 32:585–602 DOI 10.1007/s10712-011-9119-1

We estimate the rise in global average sea level from satellite altimeter data for 1993–2009 and from coastal and island sea-level measurements from 1880 to 2009. For
1993–2009 and after correcting for glacial isostatic adjustment, the estimated rate of rise is 3.2 ± 0.4 mm year-1 from the satellite data and 2.8 ± 0.8 mm year-1 from the in situ data.The global average sea-level rise from 1880 to 2009 is about 210 mm. The linear trend from 1900 to 2009 is 1.7 ± 0.2 mm year-1 and since 1961 is 1.9 ± 0.4 mm year-1. There is considerable variability in the rate of rise during the twentieth century but there has been a statistically significant acceleration since 1880 and 1900 of 0.009 ± 0.003 mm year-2 and 0.009 ± 0.004 mm year-2, respectively. Since the start of the altimeter record in 1993,global average sea level rose at a rate near the upper end of the sea level projections of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Third and Fourth Assessment Reports. However, the reconstruction indicates there was little net change in sea level from 1990 to 1993, most likely as a result of the volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991.

Paleoclimatic Evidence for Future Ice-Sheet Instability and Rapid Sea-Level Rise

Science 24 March 2006:
Vol. 311 no. 5768 pp. 1747-1750
DOI: 10.1126/science.1115159  

Ice sheet mass balance and sea level

I. Allisona1 c1, R.B. Alleya2, H.A. Frickera3, R.H. Thomasa4 and R.C. Warnera1
a1 Australian Antarctic Division and Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, Hobart, TAS 7050, Australia
a2 Department of Geosciences and Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
a3 Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
a4 EG&G Technical Services Inc., Chincoteague, VA 23336, USA
Antarctic Science (2009), 21:413-426 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2009
The US insurance industry appears to accept the potential catastrophic impacts of manmade global climate change!
But environmental attorney Catriona MacGregor told she does not buy the idea that environmental catastrophes aren’t in the offing due to global climate change. 
“The insurance industry, an industry that has significant expertise in measuring and calculating risk, was one of the first to link manmade emissions with mounting warming and catastrophes,” she said. 
“This industry is not considered a pro-environment industry -- it is purely in the business of risk management and calculation. Nationally and internationally, this industry is unanimously adopting the view that global warming is manmade."

Ufox you are a climate skeptic dope! Do your homework and then you will not look like such a fool!!!!!
Report to moderator   Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of the admin.The QED patent stands unchallenged as it differs from ANY other GB method of ML or anybody else and works beautifully using just a single length unipolar pulse.
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting  |  Off topic  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: A small problem of credibility! « previous next »
Jump to:  

Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder

BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!