northwest Climate Science Is Settled Enough
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Tuesday March 28 2017 17:10:28 AEDT PM
Home Help Login Register
News: forum firewall bad behaviour Cloudflare Bot scout
Welcome to the Australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum founded in July 2010, an add free totally independent forum with over 70 boards and paid for and managed by the Admin.Total forum Topics:8,673 Total forum Posts:41,176  Members: 641 Total page views:7,742,442 Admin and  forum and domain name owner :marjen at optusnet.com.au. Guests can only see a limited number of boards at present and cannot see any links. Guest cannot post and never will be permitted too!Registration of new members must be approved by admin.Anyone known to have any past or present association with Codan/ML or acting on their behalf as a proxy or intermediary  will not have their registration approved. All  original Photos and posts and  original materials displayed on this site are COPYRIGHTED and remain the property of the poster and the australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com. All messages on this forum express the personal views of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily being in accord with those of the forum owner and neither the owner of this forum and its domain name nor SMF or the forum software developers or the forum host shall be held responsible for the content of any message. Admin reserves the right to remove any offensive or objectionable posts. No defamatory material or politics/religion or issues of race will be permitted.
QED is here! ML have NOT stopped the QED!
Goldsearch Australia has been appointed the Australian Distributor for the QED. QED info on the Goldsearch website has been updated.
This is the only forum where you can talk directly with the designer/ manufacturer of the QED!
Jrbeatty and Reg Wilson  and  Yellowfin have NO vested  or pecuniary interests(or secret deals or cash for comment or any other undisclosed benefits )in the QED other than using it to find gold which it is doing very successfully!
Over the overwhelming majority of typical Gf ground the QED GB works just fine! Another new user has used his QED over "fairly difficult ground around Waanyarra and Kooyoora areas  " and not reported any GB problems!
The so called QED GB problem is just  more fake news created by  some fake, delusional and dishonest imbecile cretins on 1/2 wits (who is a proven forum hacker and liar and  just dumb!) pox, liars and abomination and disgraceful atrocity sewer rats "forum" that have never used a QED! The QED has been used successfully to detect under 300k steel tower transmission lines(try that with a gp/gpx  with a mono coil!!!) so it  can handle bad  EMI! The QED will also run quite and stable in a household with electrical appliances running.Try that with a ML with a mono coil!!! "QED matches and and in most cases outperforms the SDC"  and will thrash it for depth on bigger gold. QED sales are still strong so if you are on the waiting list please be patient as BW is working 12 hours a day to try and reduce the waiting time.
Except for the USB port the prototype QED's are identical in EVERY respect to the production models and according to the designer  the production models may even be  better!
4umer makes another liar a moderator! How low can 4umer go!

australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Off topic  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: Climate Science Is Settled Enough 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Climate Science Is Settled Enough  (Read 49 times)
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 15351



« on: Saturday December 31 2016 17:39:28 AEDT PM »

Climate Science Is Settled Enough
Climate science is not settled, but it’s settled enough.
Raymond T. Pierrehumbert is the Louis Block professor in geophysical sciences at the University of Chicago and the King Carl XVI Gustaf chairman in environmental science at Stockholms Universitet.
“-----Koonin’s most seriously misleading claims concern uncertainty. There are two parts to his attack: first, that climate scientists systematically suppress discussion of uncertainty, especially when communicating with policymakers; and second, that climate science is too uncertain to provide a basis for policy decisions.
To anybody with even a cursory familiarity with the climate science literature, the claim that it is impermissible to discuss uncertainties is laughable. There is hardly anything else scientists do, in climate science or elsewhere, besides dispute received wisdom and one another’s findings. The reward structure in all of science favors those who overturn some widely accepted theory over those who just confirm or provide an elaboration on what is already known. A lot of these disputes (and I have been party to several myself) are more like bar fights than the secretive “hushed sidebar conversations” Koonin makes them out to be. Climate science has been refined in the fires of such disputes for well over a century now, and the constant turmoil of questioning still dominates the professional journals and meetings. Indeed, most of the uncertainties highlighted by Koonin were first identified and reported in professional journals by climate science “insiders” (in some cases even IPCC authors), and continue to be vigorously discussed there.”
-------Science is never settled, but it can be settled enough. Newtonian mechanics was not settled science—it was overturned by both relativity and quantum mechanics. Nonetheless, it was, and continues to be, settled enough to build bridges and design airplanes. It is in this spirit that the word settled is used sometimes in connection with climate science, and not in the cartoonish sense that Koonin fabricates in his straw-man argument. It is always easy to find gaps—even very significant gaps—in the understanding of a system as complex as the climate, but the issue on the table isn’t whether our understanding is complete, but whether it is complete enough to justify the need for serious controls on carbon dioxide emissions. It’s not the situation that the range of climate predictions runs from “pretty good” to “somewhat bad”—the truth is more like “bad” to “extremely bad,” unless emissions growth is halted and eventually reversed. “
  
link_http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/10/the_wall_street_journal_and_steve_koonin_the_new_face_of_climate_change.html
The demented  right wing extremist and climate  change denier  and conspiracy theorist  Inhere MAD should do himself and the world a favor by retiring to a nursing home where the residents won't be able to question  the delusional drivel that he spews out !
Edited:Saturday December 31 2016 17:46:47 AEDT PM
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin The QED contains NO patented or protected IP!!! No fake users on this site! This forum does not depend on  guest posting liars to survive!1/2 wit powerless to login and post! LO
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Off topic  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: Climate Science Is Settled Enough « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder

BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!