northwest Malcolm Roberts' demand for 'empirical evidence' on climate change is misleading
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Sunday June 25 2017 18:38:58 AEST PM
Home Help Login Register
News: forum firewall bad behaviour Cloudflare Bot scout
Welcome to the Australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum founded in July 2010, an add free totally independent forum with over 70 boards and paid for and managed by the Admin.Total forum Topics:8,735 Total forum Posts:41,598 Members: 670 Total page views:8,335,143  Admin and  forum and domain name owner :marjen at optusnet.com.au. Guests can only see a limited number of boards at present and cannot see any links. Guest cannot post and never will be permitted too!Registration of new members must be approved by admin.Anyone known to have any past or present association with Codan/ML or acting on their behalf as a proxy or intermediary  will not have their registration approved. All  original Photos and posts and  original materials displayed on this site are COPYRIGHTED and remain the property of the poster and the australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com. All messages on this forum express the personal views of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily being in accord with those of the forum owner and neither the owner of this forum and its domain name nor SMF or the forum software developers or the forum host shall be held responsible for the content of any message. Admin reserves the right to remove any offensive or objectionable posts. No defamatory material or politics/religion or issues of race will be permitted.
Another satisfied QED user! QED user report for 9 days detecting! User loves it, found it easy to use,found gold with it and he prefers it to his 5000! Also a report on a QED used at the beach for coin shooting.QED users reporting in with their multi ounce gold finds with the QED! More QED users reporting in! QED users are reporting that they do not find "bias drift" an issue!
The QED pictured is backward compatible with the current QED and has been designed and made by a member here. The firmware and circuit are identical with the current version except for a change in the face plate and control box. Changing to this configuration will NOT void the warranty when performed by the control box designer as it has been endorsed, approved and authorized by the QED manufacturer. The 4th button will not work at this time as the  firmware update for that has not been created yet and when its available will be provided free of charge (other than postage costs)by BW. QED Detector ,latest updates board is only available to registered forum members.

Goldsearch Australia has been appointed the Australian Distributor for the QED. QED info on the Goldsearch website has been updated.
This is the only forum where you can talk directly with the designer/ manufacturer of the QED and  also some very experienced QED users.
Jrbeatty and Reg Wilson  and  Yellowfin  (or Doug here for that matter!)have NO vested  or pecuniary interests(or secret deals or cash for comment or any other undisclosed benefits )in the QED other than using it to find gold which it is doing very successfully!

australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Off topic  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: Malcolm Roberts' demand for 'empirical evidence' on climate change is misleading 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Malcolm Roberts' demand for 'empirical evidence' on climate change is misleading  (Read 192 times)
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15496



« on: Monday January 2 2017 09:32:06 AEDT AM »

Why Malcolm Roberts' demand for 'empirical evidence' on climate change is misleading
Roberts’ argument that science is only about “empirical evidence” might sound all sciencey to his interviewees and the lay audience. But it’s bunk.
If all you rely on is “empirical evidence”, and reject modelling and analysis that uses that data, then you basically throw out large swathes of modern scientific endeavours.
Prof Steven Sherwood, director of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of New South Wales, told me:
The argument is specious.
“Anyone can claim there is no evidence if they refuse to look at it. In Galileo’s time, some people refused to look into his telescope and then claimed there was no evidence to support what he was saying. Same thing today.
The problem is that evidence does not stand up by itself and announce the answer to any given question. Evidence must be interpreted by humans. Scientists have all interpreted the evidence, going back decades, and unanimously agree that it proves beyond a reasonable doubt that (a) humans are increasing CO2 and (b) this is causing warming. There is not a single respectable atmospheric scientist in the world whom I know of, who disagrees with either of these conclusions (there are a handful who challenge the magnitude of the effect but that’s a different question).It is impossible to make a prediction based on data alone. Only a model can make a prediction of anything that has not happened yet.

And this from a journalists Sums up Malcom Roberts(and the denier dope Inhere ) perfectly!
In considering your request that I identify errors in the report you sent to me – CSIROh! Climate of Deception? Or First Step to Freedom? – I find myself confronting an unusual problem: how does one critically analyse a pile of horseshit?
  
link-https://www.theguardian.com/environment/planet-oz/2016/aug/09/why-one-nation-senator-malcolm-roberts-demand-for-empirical-evidence-on-climate-change-is-misleading-bunk
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin The QED contains NO patented or protected IP!!! No fake users on this site! This forum does not depend on  guest posting liars to survive!1/2 wit powerless to login and post! LO
kazza
Newbie

Offline Offline

Posts: 118


« Reply #1 on: Friday January 6 2017 11:43:44 AEDT AM »

Awww, Doug, not only was 2016 the hottest year on record, but also another independent study from University of California, Berkeley, + Berkeley Earth, a non-profit research institute, + NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory + the California Institute of Technology,  Pasadena, + University in Fairfax:

Zeke Hausfather, Kevin Cowtan, David C. Clarke, Peter Jacobs, Mark Richardson, Robert Rohde. “Assessing recent warming using instrumentally homogeneous sea surface temperature records.” Science Advances, 2017

showing that there was no warming hiatus between 1998 and 2015. But fortunately for the deniers, they will smugly comfort themselves but claiming that all the data is fudged, and that none of the really seriously dumb scientists working day-in-day-out in climate science have noticed this fudging, but the very extra specially clever brilliant genius GW deniers, none working day-in-day-out in this field, somehow have realised this fudging.
Logged
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15496



« Reply #2 on: Friday January 6 2017 12:18:48 AEDT PM »

  
Awww, Doug, not only was 2016 the hottest year on record, but also another independent study from University of California, Berkeley, + Berkeley Earth, a non-profit research institute, + NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory + the California Institute of Technology,  Pasadena, + University in Fairfax:

Zeke Hausfather, Kevin Cowtan, David C. Clarke, Peter Jacobs, Mark Richardson, Robert Rohde. “Assessing recent warming using instrumentally homogeneous sea surface temperature records.” Science Advances, 2017

showing that there was no warming hiatus between 1998 and 2015. But fortunately for the deniers, they will smugly comfort themselves but claiming that all the data is fudged, and that none of the really seriously dumb scientists working day-in-day-out in climate science have noticed this fudging, but the very extra specially clever brilliant genius GW deniers, none working day-in-day-out in this field, somehow have realised this fudging.


Here is the link to the full text
  
link-http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/1/e1601207.full
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin The QED contains NO patented or protected IP!!! No fake users on this site! This forum does not depend on  guest posting liars to survive!1/2 wit powerless to login and post! LO
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Off topic  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: Malcolm Roberts' demand for 'empirical evidence' on climate change is misleading « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder

BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!