northwest NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding.
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Friday April 18 2014 23:06:17 EST PM
Home Help Login Register
News: New whites Pi detector - the Superpulse. Rumors about this forum closing down or is for sale are WRONG!! ML ain't going to bury the forum! The market is burying the ML share price!!! sad1
Climate change -Re: Volcanic CO2 :The free forum wrong again!!!!!!!!     AdrainSS on 4 umer continues to post factually wrong info on climate change!
General chat and discussion forum- Re: First try out of my Garrett ATX in Heathcote
This is a member only forum.To view all of the forum boards(71 in total) or post you must be a registered forum member.Registration must be approved by admin(an email will be sent informing you that your registration has been approved)before you can post. Registration will be refused if the person uses means to try and hide their IP address.
Members who have not been online for 250 days or more will be removed. Guests cannot see any links.Guests who try to post, log in or seek password reminders from registered members will have their IP address blocked and will be denied access to the forum.
Total Topics:7,240 Total Posts:31,639 Total page views:4,717,850 Spammers stopped by MOD httpBL:14,350
 forum firewall bad behaviour Cloudflare Bot scout

australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding. 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding.  (Read 186 times)
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 12108



« on: Monday April 23 2012 14:49:29 EST PM »

NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding.
The Signatories
"Obviously this letter first gained attention because the signatories are former NASA employees.  They are being touted as "top astronauts, scientists, and engineers" and "NASA experts, with more than 1000 years of combined professional experience."  Okay, but in what fields does their expertise lie?
Based on the job titles listed in the letter signatures, by my count they include 23 administrators, 8 astronauts, 7 engineers, 5 technicians, and 4 scientists/mathematicians of one sort or another (none of those sorts having the slightest relation to climate science).  Amongst the signatories and their 1,000 years of combined professional experience, that appears to include a grand total of zero hours  shocked of climate research experience, and zero peer-reviewed  shocked climate science papers. shocked"  

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Response from NASA Chief Scientist Waleed Abdalati to Letter on NASA Climate Studies
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You have to do better than this Inhere! NASA by the way has 18,000 employees!
update
New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism?
No, new data does not “blow a gaping hole in global warming alarmism”
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedback
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Old skeptic story that is simply wrong because “Spencer’s model is "unrealistic", "flawed", and "incorrect". As ThinkProgress points out, a geochemist has shown that Spencer’s models are irretrievably flawed, "don’t make any physical sense", and that Spencer has a track record in using such flawed analysis to draw any conclusion he wants.”
Roy Spencer’s Great Blunder
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Inhere when are you going to post some real peer reviewed evidence from climate scientist rather than the rubbish from  skeptic blogs and non peer reviewed journals?
We still are waiting for you or the Coota skeptic to come up with any natural forcings that can explain all the observations and account for the AGW signatures.Put up some peer reviewed climate science to show us that the IPCC and the overwhelming majority of climate scientists have got it all wrong.ie put up or shut up!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Also worth noting that some of these Ex NASA employees have been invited to attend a Heartland  Institute conference on climate change in may!I wonder if any are receiving any money or support from the HI?
Inside the dark Heartland of climate denialism
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
doug smile

« Last Edit: Monday April 23 2012 15:40:46 EST PM by Doug » Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily being in accord with those of the forum owner.It has NOT been proven  beyond ALL reasonable doubt in the appropriate court that the QED infringes ANY patented or otherwise protected ML IP!!!!
WM6
invited members
Senior Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: leet



« Reply #1 on: Monday April 23 2012 20:06:38 EST PM »

Constant and growing environment polluting cannot be excused by science.

This is crime against humanity, not science.
Logged

Global capital is ruining your life?
You have right to self-defence!
Huego
invited members
Supreme Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3611


Dark Knight? No, Sunny Days!


« Reply #2 on: Monday April 23 2012 20:15:17 EST PM »

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Constant and growing environment polluting cannot be excused by science.

This is crime against humanity, not science.

POLLUTION is UNCOVERED & EXPLAINED BY SCIENCE, not excused or endorsed by science.
Industry & commercial interests ("market forces") may find reasons (costs, eroding profit etc) to overlook reality.

Perhaps this is what you meant.
« Last Edit: Monday April 23 2012 20:16:51 EST PM by Huego » Logged

Views expressed by Huego are without prejudice, in the public / consumer interest or their "right to know"!
Huego reserves his right to: think freely & speculate, express & defend himself with truth as he sees it, entertain, use wit & humour, spread FOX bait, make mistakes & even to change his mind
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding. « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
gold