northwest NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding.
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Wednesday December 2 2015 03:26:35 EST AM
Home Help Login Register
News: forum firewall bad behaviour Cloudflare Bot scout
Welcome to the Australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum founded in July 2010, an add free totally independent forum with over 70 boards and paid for and managed by the Admin.Total forum Topics: 8,128 Total forum Posts: 37,007 Members: 539
Admin and  forum owner :marjen at
Only registered members can post.Registration must be approved by admin.Guests cannot view all boards or see any links in posts.
The above plugins are FREE and help protect the forum from hackers and spambots.
see just a small sample of endorsements for the forum below: 6.4 million visitors can't be wrong!
 From 1Halfgram4three :"Now if you want a forum that's informitive and expertly run, this site below is the one for you"
“I trust you 100% Doug, it's just a topic/matter that's being brought up on other forums lately, once again your gone above and beyond to ensure this forum remains one of the very best and user secure gold prospecting forums that I know of. "I guess people know where all the real action is, enjoy all your topics/info and the way you keep your forum free of well, we know what lol, well done!!"
“You are a top bloke doug   By giving this bloke the best advice out of everyone, to save him a small fortune and legal trouble for years “
“-------this site  (dougs)has all the real action,projects, truths, non-deleting of topics and above all the best personalities"
PM to me from a new member.
“Terrific forum glad I joined! The work you have put in is obvious and I am sure is appreciated by members”
Hi Doug,
“I  do not agree with everything you post here as I have told you privately but I do congratulate you on how you manage the forum. Its free of all the nasty personal stuff we  often see on finders and the offensive ,vile and nasty stuff that dominates 1/2 grams forum. I was very surprised to find that 1/2 gram was once member here but can understand now why you banned him.”Thanks again keep up the good work”
Updates on the Moodz pulsar detector,
The  sad 7000 saga: latest update Sept 9th! More sad news! More experienced prospectors sell their Zeds .   
Note how all the sycophantic pro ML anti anything else sucks like Robby_H  (the ostrich syndrome :put your head in  the sand!)remain silent about all the problems that have been reported for the 7000!Shameful and pathetic and gutless indeed!He is not up to a challenge either, he wimps out or makes pathetic excuses or raises red herrings to hide his ineptitude!
Who is wrong JP or thePatent Parrot =Robby_H?
JP:“In simple terms the GPZ is a full blown, full power VLF”
'Patent parrot”=Robby_H on flounders follies
“Dud is telling his two or three faithful that the GPZ is a VLF detector.”
Now who is wrong JP or the Patent parrot? I think Patent parrot”=Robby_H is wrong YET again! LOL!

australian electronic gold prospecting  |  Off topic  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding. 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding.  (Read 245 times)
Revered Supreme Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 13874

« on: Monday April 23 2012 14:49:29 EST PM »

NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding.
The Signatories
"Obviously this letter first gained attention because the signatories are former NASA employees.  They are being touted as "top astronauts, scientists, and engineers" and "NASA experts, with more than 1000 years of combined professional experience."  Okay, but in what fields does their expertise lie?
Based on the job titles listed in the letter signatures, by my count they include 23 administrators, 8 astronauts, 7 engineers, 5 technicians, and 4 scientists/mathematicians of one sort or another (none of those sorts having the slightest relation to climate science).  Amongst the signatories and their 1,000 years of combined professional experience, that appears to include a grand total of zero hours  shocked of climate research experience, and zero peer-reviewed  shocked climate science papers. shocked"  

Response from NASA Chief Scientist Waleed Abdalati to Letter on NASA Climate Studies
You have to do better than this Inhere! NASA by the way has 18,000 employees!
New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism?
No, new data does not “blow a gaping hole in global warming alarmism”
Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedback
Old skeptic story that is simply wrong because “Spencer’s model is "unrealistic", "flawed", and "incorrect". As ThinkProgress points out, a geochemist has shown that Spencer’s models are irretrievably flawed, "don’t make any physical sense", and that Spencer has a track record in using such flawed analysis to draw any conclusion he wants.”
Roy Spencer’s Great Blunder
Inhere when are you going to post some real peer reviewed evidence from climate scientist rather than the rubbish from  skeptic blogs and non peer reviewed journals?
We still are waiting for you or the Coota skeptic to come up with any natural forcings that can explain all the observations and account for the AGW signatures.Put up some peer reviewed climate science to show us that the IPCC and the overwhelming majority of climate scientists have got it all put up or shut up!
Also worth noting that some of these Ex NASA employees have been invited to attend a Heartland  Institute conference on climate change in may!I wonder if any are receiving any money or support from the HI?
Inside the dark Heartland of climate denialism
doug smile

Report to moderator   Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of the admin.The QED patent stands unchallenged as it differs from ANY other GB method of ML or anybody else and works beautifully using just a single length unipolar pulse.
invited members
Senior Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 1626

« Reply #1 on: Monday April 23 2012 20:06:38 EST PM »

Constant and growing environment polluting cannot be excused by science.

This is crime against humanity, not science.
Report to moderator   Logged

Global capital is ruining your life?
You have right to self-defence!
invited members
Supreme Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654

Dark Knight? No, Sunny Days!

« Reply #2 on: Monday April 23 2012 20:15:17 EST PM »


Constant and growing environment polluting cannot be excused by science.

This is crime against humanity, not science.

POLLUTION is UNCOVERED & EXPLAINED BY SCIENCE, not excused or endorsed by science.
Industry & commercial interests ("market forces") may find reasons (costs, eroding profit etc) to overlook reality.

Perhaps this is what you meant.
Report to moderator   Logged

Views expressed by Huego are without prejudice, in the public / consumer interest or their "right to know"!
Huego reserves his right to: think freely & speculate, express & defend himself with truth as he sees it, entertain, use wit & humour, spread FOX bait, make mistakes & even change his mind
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting  |  Off topic  |  Off topic  |  Climate change  |  Topic: NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding. « previous next »
Jump to:  

Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder

BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!