northwest The buried hoard test
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 21, 2012, 08:45:42 AM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Robby_H :Why can't you provide any evidence for your assertions? Why was the whole "Dr Candy's GB method" thread deleted from finders forum after this post was cross posted there? Who is running scared? Who really controls finders?
http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/qed-micro-controlled-pi-detector-by-bugwhiskers/robby_h-why-can%27t-you-provide-any-evidence-for-your-assertions
NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding. http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/climate-change/nasa-climate-%27skeptics%27-respond-with-science!-just-kidding/msg20769/#msg20769
The consequences of a 100ppm rise in C02 levels.  http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/climate-change/the-consequences-of-a-100ppm-rise-in-c02-levels/
12 years is not a reasonable time:updated http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/climate-change/12-years-is-not-a-reasonable-time!/msg20848/?topicseen#msg20848

australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Detecting for coins and relics  |  Detecting for coins and relics  |  Topic: The buried hoard test 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: The buried hoard test  (Read 234 times)
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 7812



« on: September 17, 2010, 11:10:08 AM »

The buried hoard test
busting myths!
http://www.garysdetecting.co.uk/hoard_test.htm
doug happy face
Logged

"Let me be a free man....free to think and talk and act for myself."
Chief Joseph
"Don't ask 'Why'; ask instead, 'Why not."
John F. Kennedy
All posts on this forum express the personal views of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily being in accord with those of the forum owner
Aziz
invited members
Senior Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1469



« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2010, 06:33:34 PM »

Hi Doug,

thanks, it's interesting reading. Thanks for Gary's work too.

in "The Test"-section:
"Our earlier tests had proved that the Halo effect of buried coins etc played no real part in detection depth in fact the halo effect only applies to Iron. To prove this fact next time you dig an ancient coin try to detect the soil in which it came out, if the halo effect was true the soil would give off a signal to."

I think, the whole halo effect does not really exist. It's completely a myth.
Moreover, it's the sum of two effects:
- skin effect (corrosion of the targets surface)
- reactive vs. resistive signal response change due to corrosion

Well, gold does not corrode. So it applies only to iron targets (ferro magnetic correded metals).

Aziz
Logged

"Without prejudice"
My forum contribution is my own personal view & opinion.
Feel free to sue me. Not the forum owner and admin.
peterlinktech
Guest
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2010, 07:31:54 PM »

I  shake my head when i hear the halo effect, talk about an old wives tale! Disseminated ions, oxides, sulfides or any metallic particles that have dissolved into the surrounding soil or ground matrix will have zero influence on detection depth.
Logged
Aziz
invited members
Senior Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1469



« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2010, 07:36:15 PM »

I  shake my head when i hear the halo effect, talk about an old wives tale! Disseminated ions, oxides, sulfides or any metallic particles that have dissolved into the surrounding soil or ground matrix will have zero influence on detection depth.

Hi Woody,

interestingly, but ML does mention it in their instruction manual.
Even in the newest version: page 42 & 46
 rolleye 1

Aziz
Logged

"Without prejudice"
My forum contribution is my own personal view & opinion.
Feel free to sue me. Not the forum owner and admin.
Tinkerer
invited members
Junior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 412


« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2010, 07:58:08 PM »

I  shake my head when i hear the halo effect, talk about an old wives tale! Disseminated ions, oxides, sulfides or any metallic particles that have dissolved into the surrounding soil or ground matrix will have zero influence on detection depth.

The mis conception lies in the following facts:

Ions, oxides, sulfides etc. by themselves can not be detected with a metal detector.
However, these particles are the result of electrical currents, ion migration.

As we all know, electrical currents generate a magnetic field. this magnetic field in turn is surrounded by the Earth's magnetic field and therefore generates a disturbance or anomaly.

Metal detectors and magnetometers are designed to detect magnetic field changes. This is how a Halo can be detected.

Charcoal can produce a Halo as explained in an other post.

There are totally organic chemical processes that happen in nature, that can produce these magnetic fields. Such occurrences are helping to detect Oil fields,  which, I think we all agree are not metallic.

(I used to work in the oil patch)

Tinkerer
Logged
peterlinktech
Guest
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2010, 10:37:08 PM »

Charcoal is a strange one as it sounds like a target but in 28 years of metal detecting I have never found an enhancement due to any halo effect. I have purposely reburied rusted iron object after breaking up the rust in the soil and replaced the target and the response is the same, i think it has more to do with orientation than anything else. Another fallacy is that wet ground is quieter than dry, this was being bandied around for years and is not true.

Charcoal effect is more to do with conductive salts.   (ihmo)
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Detecting for coins and relics  |  Detecting for coins and relics  |  Topic: The buried hoard test « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!