Still not something like infrigment - we use mono coils.

Hi Doug,

Quite some time ago, around 2007 I made reference to the following patent and also posted a pic of Fig 8 on page 4.
The potential to use the shape of the various curves for discrimination and GB was discussed.  From memory, I believe I referred to it as the S1-S2+S3 method and it used S&H circuits.


http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6326790.html


A letter to the Ott's to let them know about 11011820 would be prudent.

I hope Tinkerer, Aziz and others now get the message about not posting ideas in forums.

regards
bugwhiskers

I am just waiting for someone, who tries to patent some of my so called "ideas".
I have posted many bull$hity ideas rather than any worthwhile.

Confusion and "noise" is a kind of protecting real innovation. The real findings weren't published yet. Maybe some confusion isn't a real noise. But who knows this?

My biggest and most worthwhile innovation is still kept secret. I am quite confident, that nobody can find it.

That's the reason, why I can ::81:: restful.
Aziz

PS: I am always saving my posts published on forums. Even this one.

 I suspect that it also won't work with rusted iron!The patent is an exercise in verbosity, just try reading it!
doug

Like the previous woeful patent on this same topic this "new" patent to me is neither inventive or novel and appears to be to be mostly prior art just like the previous version!
If all the claims in this patent were taken literally then it could be argued that ML have patented  almost any means of GB/discrimination by taking and processing of samples from a decay curve!
doug

I agree with Aziz: This patent will not solve any of the old problems.  And speaking of processing, the amount of processing power required to implement this scheme will make it impractical--this will never end up in a physical device.

Just my opinion...

Allan

Maybe this is for the gpx10,000=$10,000? 
doug

Aziz are you claiming that your Gb method will universally cancel the ground?
ie when you have ground balanced that it will not respond to any hot rocks or patches of ground that have different EM properties?
ie that any signal will only be from a bona fida conductive target?
doug

I don't know yet. I didn't test it with all kind of ground conditions.
I need to collect many field test data to analyse it.

Yes, one can make it to work in extreme changing ground conditions.
Aziz

How are you going to do this?
doug