northwest Garrett ATX Test on Buried Gold Nuggets
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Sunday October 26 2014 11:15:41 EST AM
Home Help Login Register
News: forum firewall bad behaviour Cloudflare Bot scout
Moodz detector: brief prelim field test  report and picture for members
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
New ML detector to be released before Dec 28 2014. Urbanfox banned again on another forum!!

australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Non ML Pi detectors  |  Other non ML detectors  |  Garret Infinium and other Garret detectors  |  Topic: Garrett ATX Test on Buried Gold Nuggets 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Garrett ATX Test on Buried Gold Nuggets  (Read 282 times)
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12698



« on: Tuesday November 12 2013 13:12:11 EST PM »

Garrett ATX Test on Buried Gold Nuggets
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily being in accord with those of the forum owner.It has NOT been proven  beyond ALL reasonable doubt in the appropriate court that the QED infringes ANY patented or otherwise protected ML IP!!!!
Hdphilip
invited members
Newbie
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 67


« Reply #1 on: Tuesday November 12 2013 14:14:57 EST PM »


makes you wonder how it would compare against the QED
Logged
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12698



« Reply #2 on: Tuesday November 12 2013 14:34:03 EST PM »

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

makes you wonder how it would compare against the QED

I  think that the QED would wins hands down!
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily being in accord with those of the forum owner.It has NOT been proven  beyond ALL reasonable doubt in the appropriate court that the QED infringes ANY patented or otherwise protected ML IP!!!!
mylab
invited members
Newbie
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 37


« Reply #3 on: Tuesday November 12 2013 17:15:38 EST PM »

The result here on a 7 gram nugget shows that the 3-oz air test depth spoken about on the ATX forum is not an accurate indicator of the depth potential of this detector.
Logged
Mechanic
invited members
Hero Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 888


« Reply #4 on: Tuesday November 12 2013 17:53:37 EST PM »

G'day Mylab,

You would be surprised to find that some larger nuggets don't give the depth response you would expect. If the nugget has a similar decay to the ground the detection depth can be greatly reduced. Smaller nuggets (depending on how the GB is done) are less likely to have any of their signal subtracted out therefore they will show quite good depth results. This is commonly known as the "electronic hole". ML get around this hole by having 2 channels, one main channel and the other to cover the hole in the main channel, thus giving good results on a broad range of targets.

Cheers Mick
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Non ML Pi detectors  |  Other non ML detectors  |  Garret Infinium and other Garret detectors  |  Topic: Garrett ATX Test on Buried Gold Nuggets « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
gold