northwest JP's QED review,February 11, 2017
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Tuesday October 15 2019 12:51:36 AEDT PM
Home Help Login Register
News: Welcome to the Australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum founded in July 2010, an add free totally independent forum with over 70 boards and paid for and managed by the Admin.Topics: 9,245  Total forum Posts:46,357 Members:856. Total page views:12,263,130  Admin and  forum and domain name owner :marjen at optusnet.com.au. Guests can only see a limited number of boards at present and cannot see any hot links. Guests cannot post and never will be permitted too!Registration of new members must be approved by admin.
 All  original Photos and posts and  original materials displayed on this site are COPYRIGHTED and remain the property of the poster and the  Austalian electronicgoldprospectingforum.com. All messages on this forum express the personal views of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily being in accord with those of the forum owner and neither the owner of this forum and its domain name nor SMF or the forum software developers or the forum host shall be held responsible for the content of any message. Admin reserves the right to remove any offensive or objectionable posts. No defamatory material or politics/religion or issues of race will be permitted.
QED news
QED on facebook
link-https://www.facebook.com/groups/245308699667153/403446933853328/?comment_id=403472030517485&reply_comment_id=403476793850342&notif_id=1562580344994993&notif_t=group_comment
Interfacion Pty Ltd is pleased to announce that the QED PI Detector has been modified to allow the use of DD (double D) coils. This change involves a simple change to the electronics within the control box.
The firmware has also been upgraded to include a further improved Ground Balance.
All detectors being delivered to new customers from Monday 5th August 2019 will already have the above upgrades included.
As a show of commitment to all QED owners, the hardware modification to allow use of the DD and CC coils will be provided at no cost.
Of course and as per the QED warranty, the firmware update is provided free of charge, except for P&H.
Any QED owner who plans to attend the Laanecoorie Bash is encouraged to bring their detector along and have it upgraded at no cost.
Standard postage and handling arrangements apply to other owners. Send via Australia Post the box (minus batteries) along with a pre-paid, pre-addressed bag/box to:
Interfacion Pty Ltd
PO Box 106R
Redan VIC 3350
Howard Rockey
Director Interfacion Pty Ltd.

australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Pi metal detector by Bugwhiskers  |  QED Detector ,latest updates  |  Topic: JP's QED review,February 11, 2017 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: JP's QED review,February 11, 2017  (Read 1164 times)
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 16854



« on: Tuesday May 28 2019 13:10:39 AEST PM »

  
link-https://www.detectorprospector.com/forums/topic/3022-qed-review/
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin.
When is 1halfgram4three (a proven forum hacker and  village idiot!) going to stop telling lies on his “forum”?
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 16854



« Reply #1 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 15:16:44 AEST PM »

 Nowhere in this review can i find the  results (depth etc) of the alleged testing of the QED with various sized nuggets and how these tests compared with the SAD7000 on the same nuggets. The only published depth comparison  was using a 5 cent coin!!! I wonder why?
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin.
When is 1halfgram4three (a proven forum hacker and  village idiot!) going to stop telling lies on his “forum”?
bugwhiskers
invited members
Supreme Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2201



« Reply #2 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 16:41:22 AEST PM »

  
Nowhere in this review can i find the  results (depth etc) of the alleged testing of the QED with various sized nuggets and how these tests compared with the SAD7000 on the same nuggets. The only published depth comparison  was using a 5 cent coin!!! I wonder why?
doug smile

Study the paragraph that starts with..... "For the sake of completion...."
Why were they reluctant to provide actual detection distance figures? Surely a product that costs over $9000 would have very strict quality control and final testing to ensure that it's performance was within rock solid limits.

Notice also the statement:
"we are not prepared to give exact figures to avoid any trivial arguments"

I suggest that major variations between detectors is NOT a "trivial argument"
Logged

All posts are my opinion and are stated without prejudice and in the public and consumers interest.
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 16854



« Reply #3 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 17:39:29 AEST PM »

  
  
Nowhere in this review can i find the  results (depth etc) of the alleged testing of the QED with various sized nuggets and how these tests compared with the SAD7000 on the same nuggets. The only published depth comparison  was using a 5 cent coin!!! I wonder why?
doug smile

Study the paragraph that starts with..... "For the sake of completion...."
Why were they reluctant to provide actual detection distance figures? Surely a product that costs over $9000 would have very strict quality control and final testing to ensure that it's performance was within rock solid limits.

Notice also the statement:
"we are not prepared to give exact figures to avoid any trivial arguments"

I suggest that major variations between detectors is NOT a "trivial argument"

"we are not prepared to give exact figures to avoid any trivial arguments"

 Maybe the  detector that costs 6X as much as the QED  did not perform as well on  nuggets as the 5 cent coin and Jp's masters told him not to post actual results on gold nuggets to avoid embarrassment?After all at the CT test site the SAD7000 cannot detect the last deep target  shocked whereas the QED can!
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin.
When is 1halfgram4three (a proven forum hacker and  village idiot!) going to stop telling lies on his “forum”?
Blip
QED users
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 162


« Reply #4 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 18:36:12 AEST PM »

Doug, “SAD7000”, really?

Com’on guys, rise above it.

Myself as a newbie to detecting has had a hard time trying to decipher bullshit from the facts with the QED. So what if the review is biased, if thats what you think it is. Attitudes of some supporters of the QED are doing more harm than reviews like that of JP with their childish behaviour and put downs. Has the updates improved some of the concerns JP mentions?

If you think a better comparison can be achieved, surely you know someone professional enough to run the detectors and someone able to put together some decent videos. Ive looked but yet to see anything put together. Marketing is everything...almost but so crucial.

To a neutral newbie looking to buy the QED in the not too distant future, it certainly hasnt been presented well.

Cheers.
Logged
bugwhiskers
invited members
Supreme Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2201



« Reply #5 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 18:59:26 AEST PM »

The link below has comparison videos.

  

Re the marketing, a good product at a realistic price doesn't need spin doctors.
Logged

All posts are my opinion and are stated without prejudice and in the public and consumers interest.
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 16854



« Reply #6 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 20:11:50 AEST PM »

  
Has the updates improved some of the concerns JP mentions?
Cheers.
"Note that the effective principal threshold control (Bias) is temperature dependent and requires reasonably frequent adjustment over time as the ambient temperature changes to get best results. Therefore there is NO actual specific optimal Bias number setting, rather it entirely depends on temperature. It can be as high as 70 in very hot conditions"

Yes! eg the temperature variation mentioned above by JP has been rectified.Bw has also been working on other potential software updates which i cannot elaborate on at this time because they have yet to be field tested. So the QED R@D continues as well as  a possible entirely new type of coil for the QED and GPX which again i cannot elaborate further on at this time but stay tuned.
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin.
When is 1halfgram4three (a proven forum hacker and  village idiot!) going to stop telling lies on his “forum”?
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 16854



« Reply #7 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 20:30:37 AEST PM »

  
  
Has the updates improved some of the concerns JP mentions?
Cheers.
"Note that the effective principal threshold control (Bias) is temperature dependent and requires reasonably frequent adjustment over time as the ambient temperature changes to get best results. Therefore there is NO actual specific optimal Bias number setting, rather it entirely depends on temperature. It can be as high as 70 in very hot conditions"

Yes! eg the temperature variation mentioned above by JP has been rectified.Bw has also been working on other potential software updates which i cannot elaborate on at this time because they have yet to be field tested. So the QED R@D continues as well as  a possible entirely new type of coil for the QED and GPX which again i cannot elaborate further on at this time but stay tuned.
doug smile

The other thing that JP failed to appreciate with the QED is that  the class D audio is most sensitive to changes in pitch and very small nuggets or very deep ones on the very limit of detection depth may only give a very small change of pitch.The human ear is more sensitive to changes of pitch than vol.JP does also not  report in any detail on  use the  of very big mono's on the QED which will give enormous depth on large targets. Reg i think has used a 36"mono on the QED i believe.
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin.
When is 1halfgram4three (a proven forum hacker and  village idiot!) going to stop telling lies on his “forum”?
Reg Wilson
invited members
Newbie
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 121


« Reply #8 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 21:06:06 AEST PM »

  
The link below has comparison videos.

  

Re the marketing, a good product at a realistic price doesn't need spin doctors.

Blip, I sold my GPZ for a number of reasons, but you make up your own mind. There's no skin off my nose regardless of what detector you buy, as I have no shares in QED. I use it because it suits my style of prospecting. My record of finding gold speaks for itself.
Logged
Blip
QED users
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 162


« Reply #9 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 21:52:31 AEST PM »

  
The link below has comparison videos.

  

Re the marketing, a good product at a realistic price doesn't need spin doctors.


Bug, they wouldnt be spin doctors. Isnt that what you would see JP as with his review?

A good product at a realistic price would be better represented by marketing than some posters doing damage to said good product at a realistic price.
Logged
Blip
QED users
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 162


« Reply #10 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 22:05:27 AEST PM »

  
  
The link below has comparison videos.

  

Re the marketing, a good product at a realistic price doesn't need spin doctors.

Blip, I sold my GPZ for a number of reasons, but you make up your own mind. There's no skin off my nose regardless of what detector you buy, as I have no shares in QED. I use it because it suits my style of prospecting. My record of finding gold speaks for itself.

Reg, to make up my own mind as to why you sold your GPZ would only be an assumption on my part.

I know there would be “no skin off your nose regardless of what detectori buy” Reg. Ive read enough of your posts and PM’s to determine that.

Your success is well documented and certainly not questioned by me, so i feel you may have been insulted by something i may have said? I hope not.
Logged
Blip
QED users
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 162


« Reply #11 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 22:08:14 AEST PM »

Guys, dont take me the wrong way. Im not having a dig. Im not trying to tell you how to go about things. Just observations by a prospective buyer.

Since my post i read this post on another forum re the QED. It reflects mine and obviously others.


“Closely looking at purchasing one as looks good bang for buck amongst others available in same price range but struggling with the angst that appears to surround it though. Have to agree with Kon in that its sad one has to wade thru pages of muck raking whenever trying to gain information on the unit. There are a few that heavily endorse the machine that I'm not sure I'd really want if I was the maker, as for me the manner in which they do it I find very off putting to say the least. I don't really want to know who has the biggest what ever Laughing just does it work and find gold. Thanks again for the video Mr Ararat and would love to see it against an equinox or similar price unit.”

Cheers guys.

Al.
Logged
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 16854



« Reply #12 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 22:24:02 AEST PM »

  
Guys, dont take me the wrong way. Im not having a dig. Im not trying to tell you how to go about things. Just observations by a prospective buyer.

Since my post i read this post on another forum re the QED. It reflects mine and obviously others.


“Closely looking at purchasing one as looks good bang for buck amongst others available in same price range but struggling with the angst that appears to surround it though. Have to agree with Kon in that its sad one has to wade thru pages of muck raking whenever trying to gain information on the unit. There are a few that heavily endorse the machine that I'm not sure I'd really want if I was the maker, as for me the manner in which they do it I find very off putting to say the least. I don't really want to know who has the biggest what ever Laughing just does it work and find gold. Thanks again for the video Mr Ararat and would love to see it against an equinox or similar price unit.”

Cheers guys.

Al.

 I don't agree that their is a lot of muck racking but each to his own. But the fact is that only on this forum can you directly speak to the designer,software engineer and manufacturer of the  QED as well as getting  many useful tips on use from people like Reg and Goldman and others who have NO pecuniary  interest  in the QED.As the QED is hand made the production rate is limited and if because of the "marketing" a few potential purchases are put off  i doubt that BW will be too concerned.
just my opinion,
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin.
When is 1halfgram4three (a proven forum hacker and  village idiot!) going to stop telling lies on his “forum”?
Goldman
Moderator
Junior Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 263



« Reply #13 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 22:34:52 AEST PM »

Ok, so I’m now back from my trip to Sydney and hasn’t a lot happened since last Thursday.

Like Reg, I too pensioned off my minelab (GPX) once I purchased my QED, now more than 2 years ago and have used it exclusively ever since.

I have proven to myself that it matches my GPX in all departments so I now benefit from the QED’s superior ergonomics, low weight and I’m no longer tethered to my detector via the curly battery lead which makes a considerable difference when detecting for long periods. I do use a bungee when using large coils.

I agree that there has been significant negative hype about the QED by many of whom I suggest have never used a QED, so it must be difficult for potential QED owners to sort the wheat from the chaff.

The videos on YouTube that we put together were not put downs of the other brand, but were done to seriously show people how the QED directly compares against the other brand, which I believe they do. We are not world class cinematographers, but simply let the video results do the talking.

This forum is unique in that people can ask the inventor and manufacturer of the QED questions and get answers straight from the person that knows everything about the QED, no other forum can make that claim.

There is no doubt that the (positive) message is getting out there and that the QED is gaining traction amongst the prospecting community.

Cheers Goldman
Logged
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 16854



« Reply #14 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 22:47:14 AEST PM »

 A moderator on another forum has a QED and so far seems very happy with it and has said that he intends to post some detailed reviews.
So their are alternative warts and all independent  reviews  on at least 2 other forums for potential buyers to make  informed choices.
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin.
When is 1halfgram4three (a proven forum hacker and  village idiot!) going to stop telling lies on his “forum”?
Reg Wilson
invited members
Newbie
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 121


« Reply #15 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 23:13:40 AEST PM »

  
  
  
The link below has comparison videos.

  

Re the marketing, a good product at a realistic price doesn't need spin doctors.

Blip, I sold my GPZ for a number of reasons, but you make up your own mind. There's no skin off my nose regardless of what detector you buy, as I have no shares in QED. I use it because it suits my style of prospecting. My record of finding gold speaks for itself.

Reg, to make up my own mind as to why you sold your GPZ would only be an assumption on my part.

I know there would be “no skin off your nose regardless of what detectori buy” Reg. Ive read enough of your posts and PM’s to determine that.

Your success is well documented and certainly not questioned by me, so i feel you may have been insulted by something i may have said? I hope not.
Blip you have not offended me at all. Far from it. As I said, you make up your own mind. I sold my GPZ because I found a detector that suited me better. Simple. The majority of the gold I found with the GPZ (the best bit being over 27ozs) could have been found with a much less expensive detector. Being in the right place was more important than using the worlds most expensive PI. You might possibly realize this yourself some day.
Logged
sd220d Digger
invited members
Junior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 251


« Reply #16 on: Tuesday May 28 2019 23:25:34 AEST PM »

  
Guys, dont take me the wrong way. Im not having a dig. Im not trying to tell you how to go about things. Just observations by a prospective buyer.

Since my post i read this post on another forum re the QED. It reflects mine and obviously others.


“Closely looking at purchasing one as looks good bang for buck amongst others available in same price range but struggling with the angst that appears to surround it though. Have to agree with Kon in that its sad one has to wade thru pages of muck raking whenever trying to gain information on the unit. There are a few that heavily endorse the machine that I'm not sure I'd really want if I was the maker, as for me the manner in which they do it I find very off putting to say the least. I don't really want to know who has the biggest what ever Laughing just does it work and find gold. Thanks again for the video Mr Ararat and would love to see it against an equinox or similar price unit.”

Cheers guys.

Al.

Blip.
You come out to be very well knowledgeable, that is way beyond your "newby " description.


 welcome
Logged
Blip
QED users
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 162


« Reply #17 on: Wednesday May 29 2019 08:51:58 AEST AM »

  
  
Guys, dont take me the wrong way. Im not having a dig. Im not trying to tell you how to go about things. Just observations by a prospective buyer.

Since my post i read this post on another forum re the QED. It reflects mine and obviously others.


“Closely looking at purchasing one as looks good bang for buck amongst others available in same price range but struggling with the angst that appears to surround it though. Have to agree with Kon in that its sad one has to wade thru pages of muck raking whenever trying to gain information on the unit. There are a few that heavily endorse the machine that I'm not sure I'd really want if I was the maker, as for me the manner in which they do it I find very off putting to say the least. I don't really want to know who has the biggest what ever Laughing just does it work and find gold. Thanks again for the video Mr Ararat and would love to see it against an equinox or similar price unit.”

Cheers guys.

Al.

Blip.
You come out to be very well knowledgeable, that is way beyond your "newby " description.


 welcome


Thanks mate. At this stage all i have is a counterfeit Gold Bug Pro (yeah i know!) but I have since learnt through research i need a decent PI.

I read, read and read, study maps etc. Still, there is nothing like hands on for experience. For years ive walked the dogs in old diggings. I still do. We are lucky as i have beautiful bush here (Beechworth).
Logged
Blip
QED users
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 162


« Reply #18 on: Wednesday May 29 2019 09:03:18 AEST AM »

Guys, thanks for the feedback. To see the likes of the detectors mentioned sold in favour of this detector is inspiring. Hopefully a QED in the not too distant future.

Cheers.

Al.
Logged
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 16854



« Reply #19 on: Wednesday May 29 2019 09:54:10 AEST AM »

  
all i have is a counterfeit Gold Bug Pro
Sorry to hear this.I hope you do get a Pi or a suitable VLF. If you do decide to get a QED you always know that you are only a phone call away from talking with  the person that designed and builds the QED's in  Ballarat. I don;t know of any other detector that you can do this with.
doug smile
Logged

All posts on this forum are the personal views of the author and should  not necessarily be  interpreted as those of Admin.
When is 1halfgram4three (a proven forum hacker and  village idiot!) going to stop telling lies on his “forum”?
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  Pi metal detector by Bugwhiskers  |  QED Detector ,latest updates  |  Topic: JP's QED review,February 11, 2017 « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder

BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!