northwest GMT or MXT?
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 22, 2012, 02:03:02 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Robby_H :Why can't you provide any evidence for your assertions? Why was the whole "Dr Candy's GB method" thread deleted from finders forum after this post was cross posted there? Who is running scared? Who really controls finders?
http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/qed-micro-controlled-pi-detector-by-bugwhiskers/robby_h-why-can%27t-you-provide-any-evidence-for-your-assertions
NASA Climate 'Skeptics' Respond with Science! Just Kidding. http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/climate-change/nasa-climate-%27skeptics%27-respond-with-science!-just-kidding/msg20769/#msg20769
The consequences of a 100ppm rise in C02 levels.  http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/climate-change/the-consequences-of-a-100ppm-rise-in-c02-levels/
12 years is not a reasonable time:updated http://australianelectronicgoldprospectingforum.com/climate-change/12-years-is-not-a-reasonable-time!/msg20848/?topicseen#msg20848

australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  VLF detectors  |  Vlf metal detectors  |  Topic: GMT or MXT? 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: GMT or MXT?  (Read 262 times)
Doug
Administrator
Revered Supreme Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 7826
« on: November 05, 2010, 01:53:43 PM »
GMT or MXT?
Which of these two Whites models  will handle nasty  mineralized  ground the best ie which one would you chose for Oz goldfield soils? The GM with its 48Khz frequency would be more sensitive to small gold and I  assume more sensitive to hot rocks and mineralized ground compared to the 14Khz MXT?
 Any thoughts?
doug happy face
Logged
"Let me be a free man....free to think and talk and act for myself."
Chief Joseph
"Don't ask 'Why'; ask instead, 'Why not."
John F. Kennedy
All posts on this forum express the personal views of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily being in accord with those of the forum owner
BuckAu
regular members
Newbie
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 54
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2010, 03:38:19 PM »
Doug,
I can not answer for the GMT but I have had the MXT for some time and with the DD Coil and hyper SAT It handles hot ground better than any VLF Garrett machines Including the Ground Hog. In My opinion,
Its abbility to see small specimens Is a good feature. Im thinking the frequency Is why will the QED be able to be programmed at these frequencies?
Regards Buckau
Logged
Bobby
invited members
Junior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 275
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2010, 04:00:25 PM »
Hello Doug ,
Having a Whites 50Khz machine I would lean towards the MXT for the simple reason you will be digging less ghost signals.
I've used a mates Tesoro Vaquero its 14.3khz , has a prospecting mode ,  easy manual GB , also has great discrimination for trash areas , light weight ' about 2.2 pounds.
And it signals good on  nuggets  happy face
Tesoro have a life time warranty !  Not like some others .

Cheers Bobby.




 
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
australian electronic gold prospecting forum.com  |  VLF detectors  |  Vlf metal detectors  |  Topic: GMT or MXT? « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
BisdakworldClassic design by JV PACO-IN 		Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!